<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drafting ZZW (in a 64-Man Premiere Event on MTGO)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://power9pro.com/blog/2010/03/drafting-zzw-64man-premiere-event-mtgo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://power9pro.com/blog/2010/03/drafting-zzw-64man-premiere-event-mtgo/</link>
	<description>updating the magic community on our development but also to explore the ever changing game of magic itself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://power9pro.com/blog/2010/03/drafting-zzw-64man-premiere-event-mtgo/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://power9pro.com/blog/?p=1575#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>I definitely got fortunate with some wheels, but I do see your points with building a control deck. I really, really wanted to make top 4 and qualify for the WWK championship so I was trying to build to my strengths, which are awkwardly all midrangey. Even though I had ob nixlis, I realized that there are more ways to kill him with the inception of worldwake and didn&#039;t want to go all in on him. I wanted to be able to attack well as well as block well and bounce creatures at will. 

I do agree that my p1p2 was wrong and either stonework puma or blade of the bloodchief would&#039;ve been better picks. But after seeing how things work out, I was glad to not have allies on my radar b/c I&#039;ve been very underwhelmed with half-ass ally splashes with just 4 or 5 allies. I also probably don&#039;t give blade of the bloodchief enough credit, if I was already wanting to be black there&#039;s a good chance I will pick up some vampires  to make it even better (and I could&#039;ve, seeing but passing several lacerators and ritualists), and that&#039;s not even to say that blade could&#039;ve been good without vampires; however looking what I ended up with I doubt that the blade would&#039;ve made my 40. That doesn&#039;t make the pick wrong though.

And I disagree about bog tatters, that card is only as bad as you use it in the red zone and if I&#039;m one of the black players at the table I never mind scooping it up.

Thanks for the comments though, I appreciate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely got fortunate with some wheels, but I do see your points with building a control deck. I really, really wanted to make top 4 and qualify for the WWK championship so I was trying to build to my strengths, which are awkwardly all midrangey. Even though I had ob nixlis, I realized that there are more ways to kill him with the inception of worldwake and didn&#8217;t want to go all in on him. I wanted to be able to attack well as well as block well and bounce creatures at will. </p>
<p>I do agree that my p1p2 was wrong and either stonework puma or blade of the bloodchief would&#8217;ve been better picks. But after seeing how things work out, I was glad to not have allies on my radar b/c I&#8217;ve been very underwhelmed with half-ass ally splashes with just 4 or 5 allies. I also probably don&#8217;t give blade of the bloodchief enough credit, if I was already wanting to be black there&#8217;s a good chance I will pick up some vampires  to make it even better (and I could&#8217;ve, seeing but passing several lacerators and ritualists), and that&#8217;s not even to say that blade could&#8217;ve been good without vampires; however looking what I ended up with I doubt that the blade would&#8217;ve made my 40. That doesn&#8217;t make the pick wrong though.</p>
<p>And I disagree about bog tatters, that card is only as bad as you use it in the red zone and if I&#8217;m one of the black players at the table I never mind scooping it up.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments though, I appreciate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FadeToBlack</title>
		<link>http://power9pro.com/blog/2010/03/drafting-zzw-64man-premiere-event-mtgo/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>FadeToBlack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://power9pro.com/blog/?p=1575#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Grats on the finish, I&#039;m sure it feels quite good. Some random thoughts...

p1p2 - Blade of the Bloodchief has a much higher upside, where as Mark of Mutiny is probably going to be quite poor in any slower Black deck with Ob Nixilis. Even Stonework Puma is at least a more consistent pick, though not exciting.

P1p6- I&#039;d probably take Cancel here. It&#039;s not great on your mana, but Tatters is pretty poor and Cancel plays right into the controlling deck your stitching together.

P2P2- I don&#039;t like this pick because of the deck your building. You have already made many controlling picks (Scorpion over Bloodghast, Disfigure over Lacerator [though thats not too close]) and you have a superb endgame with Ob. I&#039;d much rather have a Mosquito or Gomazoa in these builds, with the Mosquito becoming great if Soul Stair or Grim Discovery tabeling.

P2P4- Diabolist could be ok as you already picked up a late Ged Thief, but you already took a Lacerator and passed a Puma p1 so this is more accetpable.

p2p9 - With no real fear of removal, I think I might rather have Shoal Serpent as an alternate win condition/big body..but this pick is pretty irrelevant. The draft goes deep though...

P3P8 - I take Mysteries here no question. Even if you&#039;ve taken a few aggressive cards, your still pretty defensive and Mysteries is absurd in any sort of control build. Tradewinds in your slow deck..subpar.

I guess your deck did end up a little more on the aggressive side after some wheels in P2/P3, but you probably could have built a little more defensively. However, you are the draft champion, so my opinion is of lesser value =P Grats again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grats on the finish, I&#8217;m sure it feels quite good. Some random thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>p1p2 &#8211; Blade of the Bloodchief has a much higher upside, where as Mark of Mutiny is probably going to be quite poor in any slower Black deck with Ob Nixilis. Even Stonework Puma is at least a more consistent pick, though not exciting.</p>
<p>P1p6- I&#8217;d probably take Cancel here. It&#8217;s not great on your mana, but Tatters is pretty poor and Cancel plays right into the controlling deck your stitching together.</p>
<p>P2P2- I don&#8217;t like this pick because of the deck your building. You have already made many controlling picks (Scorpion over Bloodghast, Disfigure over Lacerator [though thats not too close]) and you have a superb endgame with Ob. I&#8217;d much rather have a Mosquito or Gomazoa in these builds, with the Mosquito becoming great if Soul Stair or Grim Discovery tabeling.</p>
<p>P2P4- Diabolist could be ok as you already picked up a late Ged Thief, but you already took a Lacerator and passed a Puma p1 so this is more accetpable.</p>
<p>p2p9 &#8211; With no real fear of removal, I think I might rather have Shoal Serpent as an alternate win condition/big body..but this pick is pretty irrelevant. The draft goes deep though&#8230;</p>
<p>P3P8 &#8211; I take Mysteries here no question. Even if you&#8217;ve taken a few aggressive cards, your still pretty defensive and Mysteries is absurd in any sort of control build. Tradewinds in your slow deck..subpar.</p>
<p>I guess your deck did end up a little more on the aggressive side after some wheels in P2/P3, but you probably could have built a little more defensively. However, you are the draft champion, so my opinion is of lesser value =P Grats again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

